Singapore’s casino bet pays off in extra visitors, revenue
City-state tipped to be Asia’s No 2 gaming centre after Macau
Agence France-Presse in Singapore 14 February 2011
One year after opening its first casino, Singapore has emerged as Asia’s hottest new gambling capital with a revamped cityscape and billions of dollars pouring into the economy.
“Singapore has made a dramatic entry to the casino gaming market,” financial consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers said in a report estimating the city-state’s casino gaming market at US$2.8 billion in 2010.
The first casino opened in Malaysian-controlled Resorts World Sentosa a year ago today, with Las Vegas Sands following two months later as the world economy was still clawing itself out of recession.
Resorts World Sentosa also boasts Southeast Asia’s first Universal Studios theme park, while Marina Bay Sands has become an architectural icon with its three curving towers topped off by a “SkyPark” shaped like a sleek ocean liner.
Thanks in large measure to the casino complexes, tourist arrivals in Singapore last year hit 11.6 million, breaking by far the previous record of 10.3 million set in 2007.
Most of the visitors came from the Asia-Pacific region, with mainland China, Australia, Indonesia and India together accounting for 53 per cent.
Tourist spending helped fuel Singapore’s 14.7 per cent gross domestic product growth in 2010, making it Asia’s fastest-growing economy, after a 1.3 per cent contraction in 2009.
PricewaterhouseCoopers predicted that Singapore would overtake South Korea and Australia this year to become the second-largest Asia-Pacific casino market behind traditional leader Macau.
“In 2011, with a full year’s operation for both resorts, we expect revenues to reach US$5.5 billion, growing to US$8.3 billion by 2014,” it said.
When the government lifted a ban on casinos, they were euphemistically called “integrated resorts” or “IRs” amid an outcry from civic and church groups worried about the social impact of large-scale gambling. “Definitely with the opening of the casinos, we have seen an increase in gambling addicts seeking help,” said Tan Lye Keng, executive director of One Hope Centre, a Christian welfare organisation for gambling addicts.
He said the S$100 (HK$606) entry levy imposed on Singaporean citizens and permanent residents failed to deter gamblers. Families can also apply for problem gamblers to be banned from entering the casino premises. But the resorts have also created thousands of new jobs for Singaporeans, and tourists rave over non-gambling attractions like Universal Studios.
“Visitor arrivals have really come in stronger and I think that’s a direct spin-off from having the IRs on shore,” Barclays Capital senior regional economist Leong Wai Ho said.
He said the resorts were contributing about 0.3 to 0.4 per cent of GDP, with the potential to increase to 0.7 per cent in the near future.
“That’s only when both casinos are up and running fully, so we’re not there yet actually. Contributions to date have been significant, but I think the potential is for more to come,” he said.
In the latest financial statement issued by parent company Las Vegas Sands, Marina Bay Sands was shown to have raked in US$1.02 billion in revenues from its casino operations in 2010.
Resorts World Sentosa declined to disclose specific casino revenue numbers, but its total revenue stood at US$1.53 billion for the nine-month period ending September.
Las Vegas-based casino industry analyst Jonathan Galaviz estimated casino revenue constitutes “at least 60 per cent” of the total for Resorts World Sentosa.
“Tourism is a critical economic component for Singapore’s economy,” Galaviz said. “The exercise of legalising casino gaming, in the context of integrated resort development, has turned out to be a successful endeavour.”
But Galaviz cautioned that Singapore should not get carried away by the success of the casino-powered resorts.
“I believe from a public policy perspective, that Singapore should protect itself from gaining the perception by the outside world that it is a casino-centric country,” he said. “For example, the financial sector in Singapore needs Singapore to be known as a stable, serious, and very ethical place for doing business,” he added.
2 comments:
Singapore’s casino bet pays off in extra visitors, revenue
City-state tipped to be Asia’s No 2 gaming centre after Macau
Agence France-Presse in Singapore
14 February 2011
One year after opening its first casino, Singapore has emerged as Asia’s hottest new gambling capital with a revamped cityscape and billions of dollars pouring into the economy.
“Singapore has made a dramatic entry to the casino gaming market,” financial consultancy PricewaterhouseCoopers said in a report estimating the city-state’s casino gaming market at US$2.8 billion in 2010.
The first casino opened in Malaysian-controlled Resorts World Sentosa a year ago today, with Las Vegas Sands following two months later as the world economy was still clawing itself out of recession.
Resorts World Sentosa also boasts Southeast Asia’s first Universal Studios theme park, while Marina Bay Sands has become an architectural icon with its three curving towers topped off by a “SkyPark” shaped like a sleek ocean liner.
Thanks in large measure to the casino complexes, tourist arrivals in Singapore last year hit 11.6 million, breaking by far the previous record of 10.3 million set in 2007.
Most of the visitors came from the Asia-Pacific region, with mainland China, Australia, Indonesia and India together accounting for 53 per cent.
Tourist spending helped fuel Singapore’s 14.7 per cent gross domestic product growth in 2010, making it Asia’s fastest-growing economy, after a 1.3 per cent contraction in 2009.
PricewaterhouseCoopers predicted that Singapore would overtake South Korea and Australia this year to become the second-largest Asia-Pacific casino market behind traditional leader Macau.
“In 2011, with a full year’s operation for both resorts, we expect revenues to reach US$5.5 billion, growing to US$8.3 billion by 2014,” it said.
When the government lifted a ban on casinos, they were euphemistically called “integrated resorts” or “IRs” amid an outcry from civic and church groups worried about the social impact of large-scale gambling. “Definitely with the opening of the casinos, we have seen an increase in gambling addicts seeking help,” said Tan Lye Keng, executive director of One Hope Centre, a Christian welfare organisation for gambling addicts.
He said the S$100 (HK$606) entry levy imposed on Singaporean citizens and permanent residents failed to deter gamblers. Families can also apply for problem gamblers to be banned from entering the casino premises. But the resorts have also created thousands of new jobs for Singaporeans, and tourists rave over non-gambling attractions like Universal Studios.
“Visitor arrivals have really come in stronger and I think that’s a direct spin-off from having the IRs on shore,” Barclays Capital senior regional economist Leong Wai Ho said.
He said the resorts were contributing about 0.3 to 0.4 per cent of GDP, with the potential to increase to 0.7 per cent in the near future.
“That’s only when both casinos are up and running fully, so we’re not there yet actually. Contributions to date have been significant, but I think the potential is for more to come,” he said.
In the latest financial statement issued by parent company Las Vegas Sands, Marina Bay Sands was shown to have raked in US$1.02 billion in revenues from its casino operations in 2010.
Resorts World Sentosa declined to disclose specific casino revenue numbers, but its total revenue stood at US$1.53 billion for the nine-month period ending September.
Las Vegas-based casino industry analyst Jonathan Galaviz estimated casino revenue constitutes “at least 60 per cent” of the total for Resorts World Sentosa.
“Tourism is a critical economic component for Singapore’s economy,” Galaviz said. “The exercise of legalising casino gaming, in the context of integrated resort development, has turned out to be a successful endeavour.”
But Galaviz cautioned that Singapore should not get carried away by the success of the casino-powered resorts.
“I believe from a public policy perspective, that Singapore should protect itself from gaining the perception by the outside world that it is a casino-centric country,” he said. “For example, the financial sector in Singapore needs Singapore to be known as a stable, serious, and very ethical place for doing business,” he added.
Post a Comment