Former Singaporean lawyer Gopalan Nair, now back home in the United States, has retracted apologies and statements he made in court here last month.
Mr. Nair, an American citizen, had admitted to being in contempt of court and apologised for offending remarks he made about the judiciary and a district judge.
He also promised to remove two blog posts relating to his trial and conviction for disorderly behaviour.
But in a blog post last Friday - two days after returning to the US from Singapore - he announced that he was withdrawing the admission and apologies, and repeated his criticism of the judiciary.
Mr. Nair, who lives in Fremont, near San Francisco, wrote: ‘The only reason for my apology was a desire to get out of prison as soon as possible.
‘They brought these new contempt charges while I was incarcerated in prison, with only 8 days to go for my release. If I had not apologised as Lee Kuan Yew wanted, there was the possibility that I could be kept in prison for a further period of up to 6 months ...’
On the two postings he agreed to remove, and which he did delete from his blog, he ‘will be re-posting those two blog posts and stand by every word that I had written in them’.
He has yet to re-post them, a check last night showed.
Asked for comments on these developments, a spokesman for the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said it is ‘currently looking into the matter’.
Mr. Nair came to Singapore in May to attend a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party, its chief Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.
Former Singaporean lawyer Gopalan Nair, now back home in the United States, has retracted apologies and statements he made in court here last month.
Mr. Nair, an American citizen, had admitted to being in contempt of court and apologised for offending remarks he made about the judiciary and a district judge.
He also promised to remove two blog posts relating to his trial and conviction for disorderly behaviour.
But in a blog post on Nov 28 - two days after returning to the US from Singapore - he announced that he was withdrawing the admission and apologies, and repeated his criticism of the judiciary.
Mr. Nair, who lives in Fremont, near San Francisco, wrote: ‘The only reason for my apology was a desire to get out of prison as soon as possible.
‘They brought these new contempt charges while I was incarcerated in prison, with only eight days to go for my release. If I had not apologised as Lee Kuan Yew wanted, there was the possibility that I could be kept in prison for a further period of up to six months...’
On the two postings he agreed to remove, and which he did delete from his blog, he ‘will be re-posting those two blog posts and stand by every word that I had written in them’.
He has yet to re-post them, a check last night showed.
Asked for comments on these developments, a spokesman for the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said it is ‘currently looking into the matter’.
Mr. Nair came to Singapore in May to attend a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party, its chief Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.
In writing about the case on his blog, he insulted High Court Justice Belinda Ang, who presided over the case. He was charged and found guilty of the offence and received a three-month jail term in September.
Separately, in July, he behaved in a disorderly fashion and hurled expletives at police officers. He was charged and after a trial held on various dates between July and September, he was fined $3,000.
In late October, while he was serving his three-month term, the AGC applied to start contempt proceedings for Mr. Nair’s attacks on the independence of the judge and judiciary. These were made during his trial for disorderly conduct and in two blog posting.
The posts on Sept 1 and Sept 6 were titled ‘Another classic case of trying to use the courts to silence dissent’ and ‘Convicted’.
But when he was brought to court on Nov 12 for the contempt hearing, Mr. Nair unconditionally withdrew the allegations he made against District Judge James Leong, and statements alleging that the courts were beholden to the Government.
As a result of the apology and an undertaking he gave not to make such statements in future, and to remove the offending blog posts, the AGC did not press for a jail term.
Mr. Nair was admonished, warned against launching future attacks on the judiciary, and had to pay the AGC $5,000 in legal costs.
Shortly after his release from prison on Nov 20 - following a one-third remission on his three-month sentence for good behaviour - he returned to the US.
Apart from last Friday’s blog post retracting his statements, Mr. Nair had a separate post on Sunday criticising High Court Justice Judith Prakash. This was over the jail terms she imposed on three men found to be in contempt of court for wearing T-shirts depicting a kangaroo in judge’s robes.
2 comments:
Former Singaporean lawyer Gopalan Nair, now back home in the United States, has retracted apologies and statements he made in court here last month.
Mr. Nair, an American citizen, had admitted to being in contempt of court and apologised for offending remarks he made about the judiciary and a district judge.
He also promised to remove two blog posts relating to his trial and conviction for disorderly behaviour.
But in a blog post last Friday - two days after returning to the US from Singapore - he announced that he was withdrawing the admission and apologies, and repeated his criticism of the judiciary.
Mr. Nair, who lives in Fremont, near San Francisco, wrote: ‘The only reason for my apology was a desire to get out of prison as soon as possible.
‘They brought these new contempt charges while I was incarcerated in prison, with only 8 days to go for my release. If I had not apologised as Lee Kuan Yew wanted, there was the possibility that I could be kept in prison for a further period of up to 6 months ...’
On the two postings he agreed to remove, and which he did delete from his blog, he ‘will be re-posting those two blog posts and stand by every word that I had written in them’.
He has yet to re-post them, a check last night showed.
Asked for comments on these developments, a spokesman for the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said it is ‘currently looking into the matter’.
Mr. Nair came to Singapore in May to attend a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party, its chief Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.
Nair Retracts Apologies
3 December 2008
Former Singaporean lawyer Gopalan Nair, now back home in the United States, has retracted apologies and statements he made in court here last month.
Mr. Nair, an American citizen, had admitted to being in contempt of court and apologised for offending remarks he made about the judiciary and a district judge.
He also promised to remove two blog posts relating to his trial and conviction for disorderly behaviour.
But in a blog post on Nov 28 - two days after returning to the US from Singapore - he announced that he was withdrawing the admission and apologies, and repeated his criticism of the judiciary.
Mr. Nair, who lives in Fremont, near San Francisco, wrote: ‘The only reason for my apology was a desire to get out of prison as soon as possible.
‘They brought these new contempt charges while I was incarcerated in prison, with only eight days to go for my release. If I had not apologised as Lee Kuan Yew wanted, there was the possibility that I could be kept in prison for a further period of up to six months...’
On the two postings he agreed to remove, and which he did delete from his blog, he ‘will be re-posting those two blog posts and stand by every word that I had written in them’.
He has yet to re-post them, a check last night showed.
Asked for comments on these developments, a spokesman for the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said it is ‘currently looking into the matter’.
Mr. Nair came to Singapore in May to attend a hearing to assess damages in a defamation suit that Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew won against the Singapore Democratic Party, its chief Chee Soon Juan and his sister Chee Siok Chin.
In writing about the case on his blog, he insulted High Court Justice Belinda Ang, who presided over the case. He was charged and found guilty of the offence and received a three-month jail term in September.
Separately, in July, he behaved in a disorderly fashion and hurled expletives at police officers. He was charged and after a trial held on various dates between July and September, he was fined $3,000.
In late October, while he was serving his three-month term, the AGC applied to start contempt proceedings for Mr. Nair’s attacks on the independence of the judge and judiciary. These were made during his trial for disorderly conduct and in two blog posting.
The posts on Sept 1 and Sept 6 were titled ‘Another classic case of trying to use the courts to silence dissent’ and ‘Convicted’.
But when he was brought to court on Nov 12 for the contempt hearing, Mr. Nair unconditionally withdrew the allegations he made against District Judge James Leong, and statements alleging that the courts were beholden to the Government.
As a result of the apology and an undertaking he gave not to make such statements in future, and to remove the offending blog posts, the AGC did not press for a jail term.
Mr. Nair was admonished, warned against launching future attacks on the judiciary, and had to pay the AGC $5,000 in legal costs.
Shortly after his release from prison on Nov 20 - following a one-third remission on his three-month sentence for good behaviour - he returned to the US.
Apart from last Friday’s blog post retracting his statements, Mr. Nair had a separate post on Sunday criticising High Court Justice Judith Prakash. This was over the jail terms she imposed on three men found to be in contempt of court for wearing T-shirts depicting a kangaroo in judge’s robes.
Post a Comment