Saturday 21 May 2011

Can China keep it up?

Economic, political and environmental challenges are bound to slow the country down

2 comments:

  1. Can China keep it up?

    Economic, political and environmental challenges are bound to slow the country down

    By HUGO DIXON
    13 May 2011

    How fast can China grow over the next decade? Nowhere near the breakneck speed it has enjoyed over the past three decades. Multiple economic, environmental and political challenges will slow it down.

    The capitalist revolution launched by Deng Xiaoping after Mao Zedong’s death still has a long way to go. But it is now in its early middle ages rather than its infancy. The government recognises that the old model driven by exports and investment is running out of steam; indeed, its recently unveiled 12th five-year plan tries to grapple with that challenge.

    But it won’t be easy for the next generation of leaders, who are due to take over next year, to devise a new model that can move nearly as fast as the old one. Growth since 1980 has averaged 10 per cent a year, according to official statistics. Such rapid growth over such a long period is virtually unique.

    In the early stages of economic development, a country can grow very fast with the right policies. It is in catch-up mode. The quality and quantity of labour expand rapidly as the benefits of education kick in and the labour force grows. The quality and quantity of capital also take off if cutting-edge technologies from abroad are adopted and money is poured into equipment, factories and infrastructure. And efficiency improves, especially if markets are freed up to competition.

    This is basically what has happened in China since Deng launched his revolution. The country has witnessed a rapid urbanisation which flooded factories with cheap labour: The urban share of the total population has grown from 20 per cent to 50 per cent between 1980 and 2010. People have worked incredibly hard to escape the poverty of their forebears.

    Investment has been especially high: reaching a mind-boggling 48 per cent of GDP in 2009. And exports have been driven ever upwards by an artificially low exchange rate, combined with closer integration in the world economy since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

    Economic headwinds

    These trends can’t continue at the same pace. The country’s exports are now so big that it can’t keep expanding its share of world trade so fast. What’s more, its indebted customers in the West have a limited ability to keep buying.

    The West is also turning up the pressure on Beijing to allow the yuan to appreciate, as politicians worry that an undervalued exchange rate is putting their own workers out of jobs. The topic was on the agenda again when senior Chinese and American officials met for the latest in their series of strategic and economic dialogues in Washington on May 9-10.

    Exports peaked at 35 per cent of GDP in 2007, just before the global financial crisis. After that, China’s rapid growth was fuelled instead by a stimulus programme of heavy infrastructure spending and massive expansion of credit. But, as more and more roads, high-speed railways, factories, office blocks and homes are built, the returns on investment are falling. The net return on total assets in the entire economy is estimated at only 1.2 per cent in 2009, according to Lombard Street Research.

    The financial consequences of this investment splurge haven’t become fully apparent. The over-investment in property has been disguised by the credit expansion, which fuelled what looks like a speculative bubble. Meanwhile, the low returns in infrastructure are often hidden in the off-balance sheet vehicles of China’s local governments.

    A burst property and infrastructure bubble would rock the economy, not least because construction has been such an important engine for growth. True, it’s unlikely to lead to a financial crisis because bad debts can be dealt with by the central government bailing out either the local governments or the banks.

    But Beijing won’t be able to keep repeating the same trick; otherwise its own currently strong fiscal position will be under threat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Malthus with a twist

    If China only had to contend with slowing export and investment growth, it might be able to engineer a gradual slowdown in its economy - averaging perhaps 7 per cent over the next decade. That’s actually the government’s new target, although it consistently sets hurdles it expects to be able to jump easily. But demographic and environmental challenges mean that even hitting 7 per cent could be tough.

    A rapidly ageing population is one - the result of rising life expectancy and the country’s one-child policy, launched to prevent overpopulation in 1978. The proportion of people aged 14 or younger was 16.6 per cent in 2010, down 6.3 percentage points since 2000, according to the latest census. The number of aged 60 or older, meanwhile, rose 2.9 points to 13.3 per cent.

    As a result, the labour force has basically stopped growing. That will slow down growth not just because human capital isn’t expanding but because upward pressure on wages is eating away at competitiveness.

    Another constraint is the environment. China is so big that its economic success is applying a brake to further progress. Not only has this helped push up the prices of commodities, which are hugely important for China’s manufacturing-orientated economic model; the country will have to reduce the carbon-intensity of its GDP to help stop the planet overheating.

    As Chinese consumers become more concerned about being healthy as well as wealthy, action will also have to be taken to tackle water shortages, air pollution, traffic congestion and other effects of uncontrolled industrialisation and urbanisation.

    All this is bound to slow China down. And that’s even before taking into account two big challenges China can no longer ignore: the need to switch gears to a new, consumption-led economic model, and the quest for social stability in a country with high inequality and few political rights.

    ReplyDelete